CanopiiCanopiiAll serversEnterprise →

pharaoh MCP Server Security Report

so.pharaoh/pharaoh

Codebase knowledge graph — architectural awareness for AI coding agents via MCP

Security Trust Score
Grade A · Strong posture
Tier 1 · Public sourceHigh confidence · 92%latest v1.0.182 Repository
Declared MCP capabilities
ResourcesPrompts

Run it securely

Host so.pharaoh/pharaoh in a governed environment — SSO in front, every tool call attributed and audited.

Are you the maintainer?

Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever Pharaoh-so/pharaoh changes score — and claim the badge for your README.

Claim this server

The short answer

Is pharaoh safe to use?
pharaoh scores 92/100 (grade A) on the Canopii Trust Index — strong posture. It passes 17 of the 27 security controls that apply to it, with no confirmed security failures.
How reliable is the security score for pharaoh?
We could evaluate 92% of the controls that apply to pharaoh. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
How was pharaoh scored?
Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Reputation731downloads/mo

Security controlslatest scored version v1.0.182

Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.

Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails

  • Warn
    Strict JSON Schema Enforcementschemas not strict

    Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.

    Fix: Set additionalProperties:false and require explicit parameters on every tool.

  • Pass
    Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno injection markers

    Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.

  • Pass
    Tool Definition Integrityguardtool definitions stable; no risky changes in version history

    Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns.

  • Pass
    User-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguardno destructive tool scope

    No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval.

Application Security Checks

  • Warn
    Dependencies pinned (lockfile)no lockfile found

    A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.

    Fix: Commit a lockfile (package-lock.json / pnpm-lock.yaml / poetry.lock).

  • Warn
    Published with provenanceno provenance attestation

    Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.

    Fix: Publish with npm provenance (--provenance) from a trusted CI.

  • Warn
    Established maintainersingle maintainer

    Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.

    Fix: Publish under an established account/org; add multiple maintainers.

  • Warn
    Has a security policyno security policy

    A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add SECURITY.md with a disclosure contact and process.

  • Pass
    No command-injection sinksguardno sinks found

    Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution.

  • Pass
    No dynamic code executionguardno sinks found

    eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.

  • Pass
    No path traversalguardno sinks found

    Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).

  • Pass
    No SSRF sinksguardno sinks found

    Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.

  • Pass
    No unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found

    pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.

  • Pass
    No committed secretsguardno secrets found

    Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.

  • Pass
    Credentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment

    Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.

  • Pass
    No known-vulnerable dependencies1 runtime deps, no known CVEs

    Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.

  • Pass
    No install/post-install scriptsguardno install scripts

    install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time.

  • Pass
    Package name not typosquattingguarddistinct package name

    Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.

  • Pass
    Adoption & popularityestablished adoption

    A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.

  • Not checked
    Actively maintainedGitHub API unavailable

    Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.

  • Not checked
    Repository not archivedguardGitHub API unavailable

    Archived repositories will never be patched.

  • Not checked
    Declares a licenseGitHub API unavailable

    A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.

  • Not checked
    Signed releasesnot evaluated

    Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.

Transport & Trust Model

  • Warn
    Execution Sandboxingruns natively (no container image)

    A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.

    Fix: Ship a Dockerfile/Containerfile (or document a sandboxed run) so the server runs isolated.

  • Pass
    Transport Encryption (TLS)guardall remotes use HTTPS

    Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.

  • Pass
    IAM / Authentication ScopingOAuth / PRM handling detected

    OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.

  • Pass
    Network Exposureno bind-all detected

    Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.

  • N/A
    Live Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned

    A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.

  • N/A
    Authentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned

    If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.

Embed this score

Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.

Canopii Trust Score badge preview
markdown[![Canopii Trust Score](https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/so.pharaoh/pharaoh)](https://index.canopii.dev/server/so.pharaoh/pharaoh)
html<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/so.pharaoh/pharaoh"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/so.pharaoh/pharaoh" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>

Versions

VersionScoreStatus
v1.0.182latest92Ascored
v1.0.18192Ascored
v1.0.18092Ascored
v1.0.17992Ascored
v1.0.17892Ascored
v1.0.17792Ascored
v1.0.17692Ascored
v1.0.17592Ascored
v1.0.17392Ascored
v1.0.17292Ascored
v1.0.17192Ascored
v1.0.17092Ascored
v1.0.16992Ascored
v1.0.16792Ascored
v1.0.16692Ascored
v1.0.16592Ascored
v1.0.16292Ascored
v1.0.16192Ascored
v1.0.16092Ascored
v1.0.15992Ascored
v1.0.15892Ascored
v1.0.15792Ascored
v1.0.15692Ascored
v1.0.15592Ascored
v1.0.15492Ascored
v1.0.15392Ascored
v1.0.15292Ascored
v1.0.15192Ascored
v1.0.15092Ascored
v1.0.14992Ascored
v1.0.14892Ascored
v1.0.14792Ascored
v1.0.14692Ascored
v1.0.14592Ascored
v1.0.14492Ascored
v1.0.14392Ascored
v1.0.14192Ascored
v1.0.14092Ascored
v1.0.13992Ascored
v1.0.13792Ascored
v1.0.13692Ascored
v1.0.13592Ascored
v1.0.13492Ascored
v1.0.13392Ascored
v1.0.13292Ascored
v1.0.13192Ascored
v1.0.13092Ascored
v1.0.12992Ascored
v1.0.12892Ascored
v1.0.12792Ascored
v1.0.12692Ascored
v1.0.12592Ascored
v1.0.12492Ascored
v1.0.12392Ascored
v1.0.12292Ascored

Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.