CanopiiCanopiiAll serversEnterprise →

orchestkit MCP Server Security Report

io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit

Read-only MCP server for the OrchestKit docs: full-text search + Markdown fetch. No auth.

Security Trust Score
Grade A · Strong posture
Tier 1 · Public sourceHigh confidence · 91%latest v10.0.0-beta.170 Repository Publisher-verified
Declared MCP capabilities
ResourcesPrompts

Run it securely

Host io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit in a governed environment — SSO in front, every tool call attributed and audited.

Are you the maintainer?

Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever yonatangross/orchestkit changes score — and claim the badge for your README.

Claim this server

The short answer

Is orchestkit safe to use?
orchestkit scores 91/100 (grade A) on the Canopii Trust Index — strong posture. It passes 18 of the 23 security controls that apply to it, with no confirmed security failures.
How reliable is the security score for orchestkit?
We could evaluate 91% of the controls that apply to orchestkit. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
How was orchestkit scored?
Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Reputation292stars35forks134open issuestodaylast commit<1yage

Security controlslatest scored version v10.0.0-beta.170

Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.

Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails

  • Pass
    Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno injection markers

    Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.

  • Pass
    Strict JSON Schema EnforcementadditionalProperties:false present

    Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.

  • Pass
    Tool Definition Integrityguardtool definitions stable; no risky changes in version history

    Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns.

  • Pass
    User-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguardno destructive tool scope

    No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval.

Application Security Checks

  • Warn
    No dynamic code executionguard1 occurrence (build/test paths only)

    eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.

    docs/site/__tests__/webmcp-tools.test.tsx:279

    Fix: Remove eval/exec; parse and dispatch explicitly.

  • Warn
    No path traversalguard50 occurrences

    Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).

    design/og-card/card.py:189design/og-card/test_brand.py:53design/og-card/test_brand.py:72design/og-card/test_host_icons.py:26

    Fix: Resolve to a canonical path and verify containment; reject ../ and symlinks.

  • Warn
    Dependencies pinned (lockfile)no lockfile found

    A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.

    Fix: Commit a lockfile (package-lock.json / pnpm-lock.yaml / poetry.lock).

  • Pass
    No command-injection sinksguardno sinks found

    Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution.

  • Pass
    No SSRF sinksguardno sinks found

    Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.

  • Pass
    No unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found

    pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.

  • Pass
    No committed secretsguardno secrets found

    Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.

  • Pass
    Credentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment

    Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.

  • Pass
    Actively maintainedrecent commits

    Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.

  • Pass
    Repository not archivedguardactive

    Archived repositories will never be patched.

  • Pass
    Declares a licenseMIT

    A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.

  • Pass
    Has a security policySECURITY.md present

    A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.

  • Pass
    Adoption & popularityestablished adoption

    A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.

  • Not checked
    No known-vulnerable dependenciesno lockfile found

    Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.

  • Not checked
    Signed releasesnot evaluated

    Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.

  • N/A
    No install/post-install scriptsguardno published package

    install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time.

  • N/A
    Package name not typosquattingguardno published package

    Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.

  • N/A
    Published with provenanceno published package

    Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.

  • N/A
    Established maintainerno published package

    Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.

Transport & Trust Model

  • Pass
    Transport Encryption (TLS)guardall remotes use HTTPS

    Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.

  • Pass
    IAM / Authentication ScopingOAuth / PRM handling detected

    OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.

  • Pass
    Execution Sandboxingcontainerized

    A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.

  • Pass
    Network Exposureno bind-all detected

    Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.

  • N/A
    Live Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned

    A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.

  • N/A
    Authentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned

    If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.

Embed this score

Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.

Canopii Trust Score badge preview
markdown[![Canopii Trust Score](https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit)](https://index.canopii.dev/server/io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit)
html<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/io.github.yonatangross/orchestkit" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>

Versions

VersionScoreStatus
v10.0.0-beta.170latest91Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.16691Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.16591Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.16491Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.16191Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.15791Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.15491Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.14791Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.14491Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.14091Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.13591Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.13291Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.12591Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.11794Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.10394Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.8994Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.8494Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.7994Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.7494Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.7092Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.6094Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.5394Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.4694Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.4194Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.3092Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.2294Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.2092Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.1592Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.1392Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.1292Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.1192Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.592Ascored
v10.0.0-beta.192Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.8094Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.7694Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.7394Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.7294Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.6894Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.6694Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.6594Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.6294Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.6194Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.5994Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.5594Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.5294Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.4894Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.4594Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.4394Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.4294Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.3994Ascored
v10.0.0-alpha.3617Fscored
v10.0.0-alpha.3517Fscored
v10.0.0-alpha.3417Fscored
v10.0.0-alpha.3017Fscored
v10.0.0-alpha.2617Fscored
v10.0.0-alpha.2017Fscored
v9.8.094Ascored
v9.7.092Ascored
v9.6.091Ascored
v9.5.289Bscored
v9.4.092Ascored
v9.3.089Bscored
v9.2.194Ascored
v9.1.194Ascored
v9.1.092Ascored
v9.0.092Ascored
v8.84.1094Ascored
v8.84.492Ascored
v8.84.094Ascored
v8.83.194Ascored
v8.80.388Bscored
v8.77.189Bscored
v8.75.092Ascored
v8.74.094Ascored
v8.71.192Ascored
v8.70.094Ascored
v8.69.094Ascored
v8.68.194Ascored
v8.67.088Bscored
v8.65.291Ascored
v8.65.088Bscored
v8.64.189Bscored
v8.63.291Ascored
v8.63.188Bscored
v8.63.094Ascored

Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.