daiso-mcp MCP Server Security Report
다이소를 MCP로! 뿐만 아니라 한국 로컬 리테일과 영화관 조회를 MCP, CLI, Codex Skill로 가능하게 해줍니다.
Run it securely
Host hmmhmmhm/daiso-mcp in a governed environment — SSO in front, every tool call attributed and audited.
Are you the maintainer?
Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever hmmhmmhm/daiso-mcp changes score — and claim the badge for your README.
Claim this serverThe short answer
- Is daiso-mcp safe to use?
- daiso-mcp scores 88/100 (grade B) on the Canopii Trust Index — good, minor gaps. It passes 16 of the 21 security controls that apply to it, with no confirmed security failures.
- How reliable is the security score for daiso-mcp?
- We could evaluate 98% of the controls that apply to daiso-mcp. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
- How was daiso-mcp scored?
- Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Security controlslatest scored version vmain@a92595e
Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.
Security controlslatest scored version vmain@a92595e
Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.
Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails
- PassIndirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno injection markers
Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.
- PassStrict JSON Schema EnforcementadditionalProperties:false present
Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.
- PassTool Definition Integrityguardtool definitions stable; no risky changes in version history
Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns.
- PassUser-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguardno destructive tool scope
No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval.
Application Security Checks
- WarnNo path traversalguard64 occurrences
Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).
docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:26docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:27docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:28docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:29Fix: Resolve to a canonical path and verify containment; reject ../ and symlinks.
- WarnNo SSRF sinksguard9 occurrences
Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.
docs/daiso-test-replay.ts:22docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:37docs/oliveyoung-replay-session-test.ts:122src/services/cgv/transport.ts:99Fix: Allow-list destinations; reject arbitrary/loopback/link-local URLs.
- WarnNo known-vulnerable dependencies3 of 199 runtime deps vulnerable; worst high
Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.
[email protected] — GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7[email protected] — GHSA-54fx-42gc-7vw4[email protected] — GHSA-79qm-7rj5-m7r9[email protected] — GHSA-8j4g-w8fx-2239Fix: Upgrade the flagged dependencies past their fixed versions.
- PassNo command-injection sinksguardno sinks found
Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution.
- PassNo dynamic code executionguardno sinks found
eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.
- PassNo unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found
pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.
- PassNo committed secretsguardno secrets found
Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.
- PassCredentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment
Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.
- PassDependencies pinned (lockfile)lockfile present
A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.
- PassActively maintainedrecent commits
Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.
- PassRepository not archivedguardactive
Archived repositories will never be patched.
- PassDeclares a licenseMIT
A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.
- PassHas a security policySECURITY.md present
A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.
- PassAdoption & popularityestablished adoption
A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.
- Not checkedSigned releasesnot evaluated
Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.
- N/ANo install/post-install scriptsguardno published package
install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time.
- N/APackage name not typosquattingguardno published package
Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.
- N/APublished with provenanceno published package
Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.
- N/AEstablished maintainerno published package
Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.
Transport & Trust Model
- WarnExecution Sandboxingruns natively (no container image)
A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.
Fix: Ship a Dockerfile/Containerfile (or document a sandboxed run) so the server runs isolated.
- PassNetwork Exposureno bind-all detected
Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.
- N/ATransport Encryption (TLS)guardno remote endpoints
Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.
- N/AIAM / Authentication Scopingno remote endpoints
OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.
- N/ALive Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned
A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.
- N/AAuthentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned
If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.
Embed this score
Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.
[](https://index.canopii.dev/server/hmmhmmhm/daiso-mcp)<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/hmmhmmhm/daiso-mcp"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/hmmhmmhm/daiso-mcp" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>Versions
| Version | Score | Status | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| vmain@d17fd5b | 92A | scored | 9/22/2026 |
| vmain@8767a39 | 92A | scored | 9/21/2026 |
| vmain@2e1d2ee | 92A | scored | 9/20/2026 |
| vmain@34400d0 | 92A | scored | 9/19/2026 |
| vmain@9c0d8d7 | 92A | scored | 9/18/2026 |
| vmain@8c510c7 | 92A | scored | 9/16/2026 |
| vmain@ca1cc8f | 92A | scored | 9/15/2026 |
| vmain@7e4844a | 90A | scored | 9/15/2026 |
| vmain@2c128dc | 92A | scored | 9/12/2026 |
| vmain@2c312ed | 92A | scored | 9/11/2026 |
| vmain@d8751a8 | 92A | scored | 9/10/2026 |
| vmain@c0464b8 | 92A | scored | 9/9/2026 |
| vmain@cc5ab53 | 88B | scored | 9/8/2026 |
| vmain@5f98b88 | 88B | scored | 9/7/2026 |
| vmain@1603076 | 88B | scored | 9/6/2026 |
| vmain@0566392 | 88B | scored | 9/5/2026 |
| vmain@13cb7b6 | 88B | scored | 9/4/2026 |
| vmain@c32aad0 | 88B | scored | 9/3/2026 |
| vmain@860c159 | 88B | scored | 9/2/2026 |
| vmain@3404b8c | 88B | scored | 9/1/2026 |
| vmain@7471139 | 88B | scored | 8/31/2026 |
| vmain@2a49b56 | 88B | scored | 8/30/2026 |
| vmain@4b03c55 | 88B | scored | 8/29/2026 |
| vmain@a791bd1 | 88B | scored | 8/28/2026 |
| vmain@bd95adf | 88B | scored | 8/26/2026 |
| vmain@d3cb49f | 88B | scored | 8/25/2026 |
| vmain@7df7c58 | 88B | scored | 8/24/2026 |
| vmain@ab4c11c | 88B | scored | 8/22/2026 |
| vmain@638c7b8 | 88B | scored | 8/21/2026 |
| vmain@917bd1a | 88B | scored | 8/18/2026 |
| vmain@a92595elatest | 88B | scored | 8/18/2026 |
| vmain@deaa38a | 16F | scored | 8/17/2026 |
| vmain@f775279 | 16F | scored | 8/16/2026 |
| vmain@1cb55e0 | 16F | scored | 8/15/2026 |
| vmain@5921482 | 16F | scored | 8/13/2026 |
| vmain@256cc40 | 16F | scored | 8/12/2026 |
| vmain@4aa01c9 | 16F | scored | 8/11/2026 |
| vmain@458e6ad | 88B | scored | 8/8/2026 |
Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.