CanopiiCanopiiAll serversEnterprise →

local-mcp MCP Server Security Report

com.local-mcp/local-mcp

Let ChatGPT, Claude & Cursor use your Mac: email, calendar, iMessage, Teams, files. Local, free.

Security Trust Score
Grade F · Serious issues
Tier 1 · Public sourceHigh confidence · 99%latest v3.0.377 Repository
Declared MCP capabilities
ResourcesPrompts

Run it securely

This server scored F. Run it behind runtime policy enforcement so one bad tool call can't become an incident.

Are you the maintainer?

Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever lanchuske/local-mcp-releases changes score — and claim the badge for your README.

Claim this server
4 issues capping this score
  • criticalNo command-injection sinks7 occurrences
  • mediumNo install/post-install scriptsruns postinstall
  • highNo risky post-publish tool changes (rug-pull)1 risky tool-definition change(s) in version history (3.0.373 → 3.0.374)
  • mediumNo over-broad / destructive tools1 over-broad tool(s)

The short answer

Is local-mcp safe to use?
local-mcp scores 13/100 (grade F) on the Canopii Trust Index, and carries 4 confirmed security failures that cap its score: No command-injection sinks, No install/post-install scripts, No risky post-publish tool changes (rug-pull) and No over-broad / destructive tools. It passes 12 of the 27 controls that apply to it.
What security issues does local-mcp have?
local-mcp fails 4 controls: No command-injection sinks, No install/post-install scripts, No risky post-publish tool changes (rug-pull) and No over-broad / destructive tools. Each failure on this page carries the evidence behind it — the file and line, dependency, or CVE that decided it.
How reliable is the security score for local-mcp?
We could evaluate 99% of the controls that apply to local-mcp. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
Does local-mcp have any security advisories?
local-mcp has 8 non-scoring advisories — observations worth a human review that deliberately do not affect the deterministic score, since they can be noisy.
How was local-mcp scored?
Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Reputation46stars6forks18kdownloads/mo5open issues1d agolast commit<1yage

Security controlslatest scored version v3.0.377

Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.

Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails

  • Fail
    Tool Definition Integrityguard1 risky tool-definition change(s) in version history (3.0.373 → 3.0.374)

    Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns. How many servers fail this?

    web_wait_for

    Fix: Never add hidden directives or destructive scope to an already-published tool; document description changes in release notes.

  • Fail
    User-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguard1 over-broad tool(s)

    No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval. How many servers fail this?

    web_wait_for

    Fix: Scope tools narrowly; avoid arbitrary command execution and destructive defaults.

  • Warn
    Strict JSON Schema Enforcementschemas not strict

    Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.

    Fix: Set additionalProperties:false and require explicit parameters on every tool.

  • Pass
    Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno injection markers

    Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.

Application Security Checks

  • Fail
    No command-injection sinksguard7 occurrences

    Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution. How many servers fail this?

    index.js:95index.js:288index.js:294index.js:369

    Fix: Never pass tool arguments to a shell; use argv arrays with shell disabled.

  • Fail
    No install/post-install scriptsguardruns postinstall

    install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time. How many servers fail this?

    Fix: Remove preinstall/install/postinstall scripts, or document and minimize them.

  • Warn
    No path traversalguard9 occurrences

    Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).

    download.js:242download.js:328setup.js:106setup.js:426

    Fix: Resolve to a canonical path and verify containment; reject ../ and symlinks.

  • Warn
    No SSRF sinksguard9 occurrences

    Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.

    setup.js:434setup.js:932setup.js:985setup.js:1063

    Fix: Allow-list destinations; reject arbitrary/loopback/link-local URLs.

  • Warn
    Dependencies pinned (lockfile)no lockfile found

    A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.

    Fix: Commit a lockfile (package-lock.json / pnpm-lock.yaml / poetry.lock).

  • Warn
    Published with provenanceno provenance attestation

    Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.

    Fix: Publish with npm provenance (--provenance) from a trusted CI.

  • Warn
    Established maintainersingle maintainer

    Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.

    Fix: Publish under an established account/org; add multiple maintainers.

  • Warn
    Declares a licenseno recognized license

    A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.

    Fix: Add a recognized SPDX license (MIT, Apache-2.0, …).

  • Warn
    Has a security policyno security policy

    A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add SECURITY.md with a disclosure contact and process.

  • Pass
    No dynamic code executionguardno sinks found

    eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.

  • Pass
    No unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found

    pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.

  • Pass
    No committed secretsguardno secrets found

    Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.

  • Pass
    Credentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment

    Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.

  • Pass
    No known-vulnerable dependencies1 runtime deps, no known CVEs

    Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.

  • Pass
    Package name not typosquattingguarddistinct package name

    Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.

  • Pass
    Actively maintainedrecent commits

    Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.

  • Pass
    Repository not archivedguardactive

    Archived repositories will never be patched.

  • Pass
    Adoption & popularityestablished adoption

    A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.

  • Not checked
    Signed releasesnot evaluated

    Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.

Transport & Trust Model

  • Warn
    IAM / Authentication Scopingno authentication handling detected

    OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.

    Fix: Implement OAuth 2.1 with a .well-known/oauth-protected-resource document.

  • Warn
    Execution Sandboxingruns natively (no container image)

    A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.

    Fix: Ship a Dockerfile/Containerfile (or document a sandboxed run) so the server runs isolated.

  • Pass
    Transport Encryption (TLS)guardall remotes use HTTPS

    Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.

  • Pass
    Network Exposureno bind-all detected

    Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.

  • N/A
    Live Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned

    A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.

  • N/A
    Authentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned

    If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.

AI-flagged — for review

Observations from an AI review of tool descriptions. These are advisory only and do not affect the score — they can be noisy and need human judgement.

  • info
    Tool "get_reminder_folders" description changed after publish

    Benign definition drift: the description changed vs the prior version with no risk signals in the diff. Clients approve tools by name and don't re-review on update, so the change is invisible to existing grants.

  • info
    Tool "create_draft" description changed after publish

    Benign definition drift: the description changed vs the prior version with no risk signals in the diff. Clients approve tools by name and don't re-review on update, so the change is invisible to existing grants.

  • info
    Tool "excel_create" description changed after publish

    Benign definition drift: the description changed vs the prior version with no risk signals in the diff. Clients approve tools by name and don't re-review on update, so the change is invisible to existing grants.

Show 5 more

Embed this score

Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.

Canopii Trust Score badge preview
markdown[![Canopii Trust Score](https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/com.local-mcp/local-mcp)](https://index.canopii.dev/server/com.local-mcp/local-mcp)
html<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/com.local-mcp/local-mcp"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/com.local-mcp/local-mcp" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>

Versions

VersionScoreStatus
v3.0.377latest13Fscored
v3.0.37613Fscored
v3.0.37513Fscored
v3.0.37413Fscored
v3.0.37314Fscored
v3.0.37114Fscored
v3.0.37014Fscored
v3.0.36914Fscored
v3.0.36814Fscored
v3.0.36514Fscored
v3.0.36415Fscored
v3.0.36214Fscored
v3.0.36015Fscored
v3.0.35915Fscored
v3.0.35815Fscored
v3.0.35715Fscored
v3.0.35514Fscored
v3.0.35315Fscored
v3.0.35115Fscored
v3.0.35015Fscored
v3.0.34715Fscored
v3.0.34615Fscored
v3.0.34514Fscored
v3.0.34414Fscored
v3.0.34315Fscored
v3.0.34214Fscored
v3.0.34014Fscored
v3.0.33914Fscored
v3.0.33815Fscored
v3.0.33614Fscored
v3.0.33415Fscored
v3.0.33315Fscored
v3.0.33214Fscored
v3.0.33115Fscored
v3.0.33014Fscored
v3.0.32815Fscored
v3.0.32614Fscored
v3.0.32514Fscored
v3.0.32414Fscored
v3.0.32314Fscored
v3.0.32014Fscored
v3.0.31814Fscored

Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.