CanopiiCanopiiAll serversEnterprise →

CloudBase-AI-Toolkit MCP Server Security Report

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit

Backend for AI coding agents on CloudBase — database, auth, functions via Plugin, Skills & MCP.

Security Trust Score
Grade A · Strong posture
Tier 1 · Public sourceHigh confidence · 90%latest vmain@8ec7084 Repository
Declared MCP capabilities
ResourcesPrompts

Run it securely

Host TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit in a governed environment — SSO in front, every tool call attributed and audited.

Are you the maintainer?

Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit changes score — and claim the badge for your README.

Claim this server

The short answer

Is CloudBase-AI-Toolkit safe to use?
CloudBase-AI-Toolkit scores 92/100 (grade A) on the Canopii Trust Index — strong posture. It passes 15 of the 21 security controls that apply to it, with no confirmed security failures.
How reliable is the security score for CloudBase-AI-Toolkit?
We could evaluate 90% of the controls that apply to CloudBase-AI-Toolkit. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
How was CloudBase-AI-Toolkit scored?
Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Reputation1.2kstars149forks3open issuestodaylast commit1yage

Security controlslatest scored version vmain@8ec7084

Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.

Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails

  • Warn
    Strict JSON Schema Enforcementschemas not strict

    Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.

    Fix: Set additionalProperties:false and require explicit parameters on every tool.

  • Pass
    Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno injection markers

    Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.

  • Pass
    Tool Definition Integrityguardtool definitions stable; no risky changes in version history

    Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns.

  • Pass
    User-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguardno destructive tool scope

    No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval.

Application Security Checks

  • Warn
    Dependencies pinned (lockfile)no lockfile found

    A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.

    Fix: Commit a lockfile (package-lock.json / pnpm-lock.yaml / poetry.lock).

  • Pass
    No command-injection sinksguardno sinks found

    Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution.

  • Pass
    No dynamic code executionguardno sinks found

    eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.

  • Pass
    No path traversalguardno sinks found

    Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).

  • Pass
    No SSRF sinksguardno sinks found

    Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.

  • Pass
    No unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found

    pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.

  • Pass
    No committed secretsguardno secrets found

    Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.

  • Pass
    Credentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment

    Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.

  • Pass
    Actively maintainedrecent commits

    Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.

  • Pass
    Repository not archivedguardactive

    Archived repositories will never be patched.

  • Pass
    Declares a licenseMIT

    A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.

  • Pass
    Has a security policySECURITY.md present

    A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.

  • Pass
    Adoption & popularityestablished adoption

    A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.

  • Not checked
    No known-vulnerable dependenciesno lockfile found

    Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.

  • Not checked
    Signed releasesnot evaluated

    Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.

  • N/A
    No install/post-install scriptsguardno published package

    install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time.

  • N/A
    Package name not typosquattingguardno published package

    Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.

  • N/A
    Published with provenanceno published package

    Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.

  • N/A
    Established maintainerno published package

    Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.

Transport & Trust Model

  • Warn
    Execution Sandboxingruns natively (no container image)

    A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.

    Fix: Ship a Dockerfile/Containerfile (or document a sandboxed run) so the server runs isolated.

  • Warn
    Network Exposurebinds 0.0.0.0

    Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.

    Fix: Bind to 127.0.0.1 by default; never ship open debug endpoints.

  • N/A
    Transport Encryption (TLS)guardno remote endpoints

    Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.

  • N/A
    IAM / Authentication Scopingno remote endpoints

    OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.

  • N/A
    Live Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned

    A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.

  • N/A
    Authentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned

    If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.

Embed this score

Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.

Canopii Trust Score badge preview
markdown[![Canopii Trust Score](https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit)](https://index.canopii.dev/server/TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit)
html<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>

Versions

VersionScoreStatus
vmain@8ec7084latest92Ascored
vmain@598db1792Ascored
vmain@7d4c9ec92Ascored
vmain@142378492Ascored
vmain@6ec590892Ascored
vmain@c12186c92Ascored
vmain@c5c329e92Ascored
vmain@29146fe92Ascored
vmain@fe698de91Ascored
vmain@3ef3c0e91Ascored
vmain@4f68e9091Ascored
vmain@855ba1a91Ascored
vmain@5a1c42791Ascored
vmain@c42472791Ascored
vmain@2ada05b91Ascored
vmain@e9e4cdf91Ascored
vmain@4ee5e4c91Ascored
vmain@9873ede91Ascored
vmain@7eaa2e591Ascored
vmain@2ba79cc91Ascored
vmain@98562a991Ascored
vmain@aa891dd91Ascored
vmain@f10b80691Ascored
vmain@f4efe9792Ascored
vmain@c8900b492Ascored
vmain@21af91c92Ascored
vmain@ea2c20292Ascored
vmain@ec94edb92Ascored
vmain@00d5be692Ascored
vmain@9b297b592Ascored
vmain@1fcd61b92Ascored
vmain@927501392Ascored
vmain@4ac39c792Ascored
vmain@6032e5d91Ascored
vmain@980f98592Ascored
vmain@ef9880092Ascored
vmain@abd9b8a92Ascored
vmain@44bae5692Ascored
vmain@119c15192Ascored
vmain@4da777e92Ascored
vmain@9e570a292Ascored
vmain@884628991Ascored
vmain@ef9f18291Ascored
vmain@412af2c90Ascored
vmain@026f05a91Ascored
vmain@f3a15e891Ascored
vmain@4371f9891Ascored
vmain@711604e88Bscored
vmain@821c08f91Ascored
vmain@c15c84988Bscored
vmain@27ccc0091Ascored
vmain@88f857b88Bscored
vmain@476fa6988Bscored
vmain@02a4d8791Ascored
vmain@3ce25cd88Bscored
vmain@adf5fbe90Ascored
vmain@1938cad91Ascored
vmain@8600cb391Ascored
vmain@16cce4b91Ascored
vmain@43b60e591Ascored
vmain@d6cefd590Ascored
vmain@f07c33c88Bscored
vmain@f0170d986Bscored
vmain@fb35f3586Bscored
vmain@cc44e0986Bscored
vmain@615abd986Bscored
vmain@6bcc3dc83Bscored
vmain@1a3fe2f83Bscored
vmain@45035fc86Bscored
vmain@c1a84a786Bscored
vmain@91b042a86Bscored
vmain@442bc8c85Bscored

Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.