CanopiiCanopiiAll serversEnterprise →

LogLead MCP Server Security Report

EvoTestOps/LogLead

LogLead performs log loading, log enhancement, log feature engineering, log analysis, log anomaly detection also via MCP-server.

Security Trust Score
Grade B · Moderate posture
Tier 1 · Public sourceHigh confidence · 82%latest vmain@29c501d Repository
Declared MCP capabilities
ToolsResourcesPrompts

Run it securely

Host EvoTestOps/LogLead in a governed environment — SSO in front, every tool call attributed and audited.

Are you the maintainer?

Verify with GitHub to get alerted whenever EvoTestOps/LogLead changes score — and claim the badge for your README.

Claim this server

The short answer

Is LogLead safe to use?
LogLead scores 80/100 (grade B) on the Canopii Trust Index — good, minor gaps. It passes 11 of the 21 security controls that apply to it, with no confirmed security failures.
How reliable is the security score for LogLead?
We could evaluate 82% of the controls that apply to LogLead. Scores are deterministic — the same source always produces the same score — and a partially-scannable server cannot present a high one, because confidence caps the result. The scanner is open source, so this score can be reproduced independently.
How was LogLead scored?
Its published source was scanned against a fixed catalog of weighted security controls covering code safety, committed secrets, dependency vulnerabilities, tool-description integrity, authentication and transport, and maintenance. A confirmed flaw caps the score outright regardless of what else passes. The full rubric is published.
Reputation32stars3forks8open issues3d agolast commit3yage

Security controlslatest scored version vmain@29c501d

Each control is evaluated deterministically with evidence. The score is earned from passing controls; a failed guard caps it.

Model–MCP Runtime Guardrails

  • Pass
    In-Session Definition Integrityguardno call-gated or call-time tool definition changes

    Tool and prompt definitions stay fixed during a session — they don't change after a few calls, which is how runtime-gated rug-pulls slip past one-time review.

  • Not checked
    Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) Defensesguardno tools extracted

    Tool/prompt/resource text is free of hidden instructions that could hijack the agent.

  • Not checked
    Strict JSON Schema Enforcementno tool schemas found

    Tool inputs are constrained (additionalProperties:false), so unexpected arguments can't be smuggled in.

  • Not checked
    User-in-the-Loop / Approval Scopeguardno tools extracted

    No over-broad or destructive tools (arbitrary shell, bulk-delete) that warrant human approval.

  • N/A
    Tool Definition Integrityguardno prior version to diff

    Every consecutive version pair is diffed for new injection markers or destructive scope — a risky diff anywhere in history is a rug-pull (fail, durable); benign description drift warns.

Application Security Checks

  • Warn
    No dynamic code executionguard2 occurrences (build/test paths only)

    eval()/exec()/Function() on tool-derived strings allows arbitrary code execution.

    demo/parser_benchmark/ano_detection.py:121demo/parser_benchmark/parsing_speed.py:79

    Fix: Remove eval/exec; parse and dispatch explicitly.

  • Warn
    No path traversalguard1 occurrence (build/test paths only)

    Naive path checks let tools read/write outside intended directories (EscapeRoute-class).

    demo/AutoLoader_samples.py:60

    Fix: Resolve to a canonical path and verify containment; reject ../ and symlinks.

  • Warn
    No SSRF sinksguard1 occurrence

    Fetching tool-supplied URLs can pivot into internal networks and metadata services.

    downloader/download_data.py:64

    Fix: Allow-list destinations; reject arbitrary/loopback/link-local URLs.

  • Warn
    No known-vulnerable dependencies2 of 113 runtime deps vulnerable; worst high

    Runtime dependencies (parsed from the lockfile) are scanned against OSV.dev for published CVEs. Advisory: flagged dependencies lower the score but don't hard-cap it, since transitive reachability is unproven.

    [email protected] — GHSA-6fqq-452j-qhrp[email protected] — GHSA-v36g-jcw9-x7cw[email protected] — GHSA-42vr-xj54-vc7v[email protected] — GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449

    Fix: Upgrade the flagged dependencies past their fixed versions.

  • Warn
    Has a security policyno security policy

    A SECURITY.md gives a private path to report vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add SECURITY.md with a disclosure contact and process.

  • Pass
    No command-injection sinksguardno sinks found

    Untrusted tool input reaching a shell yields remote code execution.

  • Pass
    No unsafe deserializationguardno sinks found

    pickle/yaml.load/etc. on untrusted data can execute code.

  • Pass
    No committed secretsguardno secrets found

    Hardcoded keys/tokens in published source are live credentials an attacker can use.

  • Pass
    Credentials sourced from environmentreads credentials from environment

    Reading secrets from env/secret stores avoids hardcoding them.

  • Pass
    Dependencies pinned (lockfile)lockfile present

    A lockfile makes installs reproducible and resistant to silent dependency swaps.

  • Pass
    Actively maintainedrecent commits

    Unmaintained servers don't receive security fixes.

  • Pass
    Repository not archivedguardactive

    Archived repositories will never be patched.

  • Pass
    Declares a licenseMIT

    A clear license is required for legal enterprise use.

  • Pass
    Adoption & popularityestablished adoption

    A small, capped nudge from stars/downloads — widely-used servers get more eyes on bugs. It can never offset a real security failure.

  • Not checked
    Signed releasesnot evaluated

    Signed releases let consumers verify artifacts weren't tampered with.

  • N/A
    No install/post-install scriptsguardno published package

    install hooks run arbitrary code on every consumer at install time.

  • N/A
    Package name not typosquattingguardno published package

    Names mimicking popular packages are a common malware delivery vector.

  • N/A
    Published with provenanceno published package

    Build provenance attests the artifact was built from the claimed source by CI.

  • N/A
    Established maintainerno published package

    Brand-new / single anonymous maintainers raise takeover and malware risk.

Transport & Trust Model

  • Warn
    Execution Sandboxingruns natively (no container image)

    A container/sandbox image limits blast radius; a server that runs natively has full host access.

    Fix: Ship a Dockerfile/Containerfile (or document a sandboxed run) so the server runs isolated.

  • Pass
    Network Exposureno bind-all detected

    Binding 0.0.0.0 or exposing debug inspectors widens the attack surface.

  • N/A
    Transport Encryption (TLS)guardno remote endpoints

    Plaintext HTTP exposes traffic and bearer tokens to interception.

  • N/A
    IAM / Authentication Scopingno remote endpoints

    OAuth 2.1 / Protected Resource Metadata gates who can invoke tools.

  • N/A
    No Token Passthroughguardno HTTP transport

    The client's token is never forwarded to downstream APIs — the server obtains its own, correctly-scoped credential instead.

  • N/A
    DNS-Rebinding Protectionno HTTP transport

    HTTP endpoints reject requests carrying an unlisted Origin, so a malicious web page can't drive the server through the user's browser.

  • N/A
    Live Endpoint Reachablenot dynamically scanned

    A dynamic scan connected to the declared remote endpoint and it responded — verified live, not a dead URL.

  • N/A
    Authentication Enforced (live)not dynamically scanned

    If the server declares auth is required, it must actually reject anonymous clients. Serving tools to unauthenticated callers is a real exposure.

Embed this score

Add the live badge to your README — it updates automatically on every rescan.

Canopii Trust Score badge preview
markdown[![Canopii Trust Score](https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/EvoTestOps/LogLead)](https://index.canopii.dev/server/EvoTestOps/LogLead)
html<a href="https://index.canopii.dev/server/EvoTestOps/LogLead"><img src="https://index.canopii.dev/api/badge/EvoTestOps/LogLead" alt="Canopii Trust Score" /></a>

Versions

VersionScoreStatus
vmain@29c501dlatest80Bscored
vmain@ad7049579Bscored
vmain@aff97ac79Bscored
vmain@90c852179Bscored
vmain@d7a92d380Bscored
vmain@901039f84Bscored
vmain@e53df7680Bscored
vmain@9825e7284Bscored
vmain@005fd6580Bscored
vmain@bf5f1b880Bscored
vmain@a8b94be80Bscored
vmain@382a90880Bscored
vmain@532ca1280Bscored
vmain@c705d8680Bscored
vmain@2453cea80Bscored
vmain@6e076a215Fscored
vmain@358760515Fscored

Wondering how this compares? The MCP Security Index tracks grade distribution, committed secrets, and missing authentication across the whole ecosystem, refreshed monthly.